Whittier is the armpit of America. Houston, Texas, however, is the butthole of the Earthy, but that's neither here nor there. I hate Houston.

By the way, where are the ROASTS?!!!! Roast this prepubescent Sifter already!

rumor has it, karaidl was raised in Whittier, CA.....and it's no secret, he's wittier than most you strugglin', no jabs havin', all beside yerself, dull-ass mthrfckrs here so far-give this boy the send up he deserves.....(that difference between the color blue and the sound of a bus was some inspired shit though....what, does that happen like once every 13 years for you there, rottenseed???)

I'm sorry gorillaman, but I respectfully disagree: intention is mostly irrelevant. If someone bonks you on the head with a tennis racket while you were just standing there minding your own business, is it important whether the person who bonked you did it because you were of a certain racial background or because he simply didn't like your yellow shirt? The crime is the bonk, not the intent behind it.


A little history lesson for the woefully ignorant on the origins of hate crimes:

During 1988, the predominant architect of “Anti-Hate” legislation, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, helped sponsor a nationwide, law-student competition to write a model “Anti-Hate” law for America. This law would criminalize not just physical acts of racial violence but statements that might lead to violence.

On April 20-22, the ADL helped sponsor a conference at New York’s prestigious Hofstra University entitled “Group Defamation and Freedom of Speech: The Relationship Between Language and Violence.” Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich), also a pioneer of the hate crimes legislation now before Congress, was the keynote speaker. The winner of the hate crimes competition was announced as Joseph Ribakoff, a law student from Whittier College in California.

In his prize-winning proposal, Ribakoff asserted that with the upsurge of “Hate Crimes” in America, it will no longer suffice for the government merely to outlaw acts of physical violence; it must ban those forms of verbal communication which cause hatred, suspicion, and possible violence against groups of people. Ribakoff recommends that federal and state censorship boards be established to review all films and videotapes before they are shown publicly, determining if they contain statements which might stimulate hatred or contempt for some group of people. If so, an immediate court order would ban the film in America. Ribakoff: “Any person, persons, or organizations which publicly shows a film or movie before it has been submitted and reviewed by the agency shall have committed a misdemeanor.”

Further, if anyone is a member of an organization that has publicly shown such a film and intends to remain a member, supportive of its goals, he also will have committed a misdemeanor.

Ribakoff’s prize-winning “Group Libel Statute” was not limited to verbal criticism of Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, etc., but would indict anyone who criticized homosexuals as a group, causing “mental anguish” to members of that minority.

And so it began. Other countries are far deeper into this Orwellian nightmare than the USA.

Preachers in Canada and Europe can now be jailed for preaching the Bible's condemnation of homosexuality.

Whether you agree with the Bible or not, that's far scarier than the boogeyman liberals are trying to make out of the Patriot Act.