Probably not dead, just attempting to be viewed from the frozen unimportant wastelands beyond the US border...

TV guy was being a jerk because he was trying to do his job and trying to get a big giant orange jackass out of his shot while he's trying to cover the iPhone launch? I'm sorry, I'm not sympathetic. I've seen the G4 shots, and it's unfortunate that I can't find them posted anywhere. They consist of Zach, the reporter, and nothing but a giant orange cyclops behind him. It's not like the Hungrr mascot was innocuous and small in the background. The background WAS the mascot. It's all nice and warm and fuzzy that the mascot is raising awareness for whatever, but people have jobs to do and his was to get him out of his damn shot. They didn't fly out to New York City from Los Angeles where they are based to get a giant stuffed head in their report. It really doesn't matter how unimportant the iPhone might seem compared to Hungrr's mission. At that time, at that moment, the iPhone was his job and his livelihood. If G4 wants to help out with awareness for Hungrr's mission, then Hungrr should contact them and set up a proper interview and people might actually know what the hell a giant orange cyclops with a piece of paper pinned to it means in the first place.
(/rant)

The quote: "Ultimately the question is of little practical significance"

= Ultimately an unimportant factor

Why is that so hard to understand?

[I]f you believe the canned version that the Kean-Zelikow commission has spewed out (which... clearly states that the funding of the terrorists is ultimately an unimportant factor.) then your either an idiot or a fool or both.

Incidentally, I thought I should probably point out that, if you're referring to the quote I think you are, you've both significantly misrepresented it and also subjected it to a hatchet contextomy. The full quote reads:

To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance. Al Qaeda had many avenues of funding. If a particular funding source had dried up, al Qaeda could have easily tapped a different source or diverted funds from another project to fund an operation that cost $400,000-$500,000 over nearly two years.

This statement comes at the end of a chapter which explains that the 9/11 plotters would never have been short of money. That is why they claim that the precise channel used by al Qaeda to fund them is of little practical significance (to this specific issue). It in no way states that the "funding of the terrorists is ultimately an unimportant factor."

Are you kidding me? WTF is wrong with you people?!?!

These are the things you claim are garbage and bull:

1.) Testimonials from the firefighters that were there claiming explosions had been occurring at the WTC before and during the collapses.

2.) No real evidence that a *757 really crashed at the pentagon (my instrument flight class analyzed this and we determined that it was a cruise missle).

3.) Molten steel and evidence from one photo that one of the main beams was cut using thermate in the exact same fashion that demolition companies use to cut such a support beam. OMG it's staring at you in the face here!!!!

4.) Lack of wreckage from flight *93 indicates that it was shot down.

Grant it, there is a lot of hypothesis in this video, but if you believe the canned version that the Kean-Zelikow commission has spewed out (which unbelievably does not analyze the wreckage and other pertinent investigative information and clearly states that the funding of the terrorists is ultimately an unimportant factor.) then your either an idiot or a fool or both.

Sounds very believable to me. Also i like the fact that he doesn´t wear a tie, as unimportant as it may seem to most others.

umm, this is about midterm elections... not primaries... you're voting on issues, and on re-electing officials to congress and supreme court and local government stuff. i wouldn't say that it's UNimportant, but definately not nearly as important as the primary elections.