I have ill feelings towards that movie. I do believe it to have shat all over what the book portrays the character to be. Although I have not seen the movie, I wont go out of my way to see it because of this preview.

My DS lite had this problem out of warranty! But in Japan they refurbed it and sent it back FOR free in about a week. Their image there is so important to them. My mum had the same problem, 10 days out of warranty in Australia. The repair cost was the better part of buying a replacement.

I think the lesson here is that westerners do not place a high enough importance on reputation and build quality, so we get shat on (hugs xbox).

Wicked awesome.

>> ^eric3579:
So, I had to go listen to the Britney Spears version of the song. What a huge piece of shat that was! I mean extra-large sized huge.


Remember, crap-ass performer. Someone else no doubt wrote it, hence the difference - go *livemusic about, um, *love?

^ Sure

You're playing the SIMS, you need to die a slow horrible painful death for allowing EA to teabag you repeatedly in the face whilst you sit there, open mouthed for the grand phallic phinale. For continually buying the trash that this terrible, terrible company attaches their name to like a vampiric leech, your eyes have assaulted your brain. They are unhappy with the years of abuse you have put them through whilst playing this game. As your optic nerve snakes its way towards your brain, it picks up electrical signals which translate as spewing gushes of water.

There is an operation to help, but unfortunately it costs exactly the same amount as the combined price of the 3000000000000 addons that EA shat out for the game which you bought, each costing more than a fantastically designed and developed indie game - which will never get the respect it deserves for ingenuity and gaming fun, so you can't afford it anymore.

That's incredible! They're rolling around lookin' for tummy rubs just like my little ones. Although, I'd have shat myself petting them.

Is it just me, or does Obama sound a bit like the Shat?

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

This would be handy. I shat an entire backgammon set yesterday.

I'm sorry that posting this vid compelled you to go and be subjected to that eric, I really am

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
So, I had to go listen to the Britney Spears version of the song. What a huge piece of shat that was! I mean extra-large sized huge.

So, I had to go listen to the Britney Spears version of the song. What a huge piece of shat that was! I mean extra-large sized huge.

Nobody can replace the Shat - you get no argument from me...

The kid's just gonna have to fill the role his own way.

*promote the shat

The Planet Earth series is great. I think its mostly because of the narrator. He could say anything and I would be impressed. "I just shat on your mother" oh, what an interesting fact that I will just forget in 5 seconds.

>> ^blankfist:
I never said a conservative government forced banks to slit their own throats, NR, so please, my dearest friend, stop putting words in my mouth to try and win your argument.

No, you just said that government "shat the bed", and not the banks. The banks weren't forced at gunpoint to make bad loans that put their own survival at risk. Low interest rates doesn't mean decreased lending standards must naturally follow, nor do laws requiring that banks not discriminate about where they take their risks require them to increase the total amount of risk they take.

For government to have been at fault, it would've been by forcing the banks to do self-destructive things over the last decade, hence the conservative government forcing banks to slit their own throats. Perhaps to be more accurate I should say that there was an effort by the bank lobby to force both parties in congress to force the banks to slit their throat, but then we're back to the banks being at fault again.

And, no, Marxian Economists are NOT experts (or specialists) in critiquing Capitalist economic systems. That statement is no more true than me saying Republicans are experts (or "specialists") in critiquing Democrats. That's like saying if you oppose something, you immediately become the expert of your opposition!

Talk about putting words in someone's mouth. You made a blatant ad hominem attack on the guy in the video, saying he should be dismissed because of his wild eyes and because he's a Marxist. You didn't challenge his facts, or his reasoning, just whether he's got an acceptable ideological background or not.

Creationists are wrong because the evidence doesn't fit their theory, but that doesn't mean all Creationists are incapable of making valid arguments on related topics.

I call you out on that, and you accuse me of agreeing with everything this guy's ever stood for, and believing he's an authority not to be questioned. Truthfully I'm not even sure there's enough here for you to really call this an economic theory. It's more of a rabble-rousing rant partially fueled by economic data, and since I'm more of a political animal, I'm all for it.

I'm just saying you are making colorful and scatological responses that are fallacious, in my own colorful and scatological way.

Pigfucker.

>> ^blankfist:
That aside, the failed economy isn't reason to make a scapegoat out of Capitalism. Capitalism didn't "shit the bed" - government spending, and endless war, falsely propping up the housing market, etc. shat the bed.
When human greed belies the current economic system, I think we'd be remiss to denounce it eagerly.


Two points: First, you just shat your own bed by claiming that a conservative government forced banks to slit their own throats, financially speaking, and Second critiquing capitalism is fair game, just like it is to question Commisar President Obama. If critique of the dominant way of thought becomes verboten, it leads to tyranny (and more German words).

All the guy is saying is "hey, check out what's been happening with income disparity, doesn't seem fair, does it?"

PS: I bet you look just as wild eyed when talking about corn.

>> ^Biminim:
Just because he's a Marxist doesn't mean he can't properly interpret data, right? Just because he's a Marxist doesn't mean he can't be right, right? If anything, Marxist economists are specialists in critiquing Capitalism, right? And since Capitalism seems to have shit the bed, isn't a critique of it the proper thing to do now?


I'm not sure if Marxian Economists are specialists in critiquing Capitalism any more than Austrian Economists are specialists at critiquing Socialism. That aside, the failed economy isn't reason to make a scapegoat out of Capitalism. Capitalism didn't "shit the bed" - government spending, and endless war, falsely propping up the housing market, etc. shat the bed.

When human greed belies the current economic system, I think we'd be remiss to denounce it eagerly.