search results matching tag: reaction engines
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (1) |
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (1) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
4.5 hr flight from London to Sydney
>> ^Ickster:
Technological questions aside, the economics will likely never work for scheduled flights. Concorde was scrapped because it was a money loser, not because it didn't work. I don't see anything here that suggests a ticket on this thing wouldn't be astronomically expensive.
Actually this is wrong. The Concorde did lose money at first, but then they did a survey asking people how much they thought a ticket from NYC to London on the Concorde would cost, and the results of the survey was that everyone thought it was more expensive than they were actually charging. So then they decided to charge a lot more for the tickets and market it as a "luxury" flight. This gimmick was successful - it became more profitable than any other division of BA.
It was retired after the famous crash while taking off in France. Even though that was it's only crash, after long investigation, and decline in first class passengers, they never brought it back.
I'm glad that many of them made it to museums, because the Concorde was a phenomenal piece of engineering.
I have no idea how well this Reaction Engine will work, but I hope to see it succeed.