No sir. There is a world of difference between slight bias in reports about the nationalistic leader who continues to attack all actual news reporters like a 2 year old and direct his terroristic followers to attack them as enemies of the people and a deeper level of bias against all non right wingers paired with outright campaigning for the same anti free press candidates.

Wait...you still defend Fox as having reporting but claim you don't need someone to bend facts? Bending facts like using proper English to describe a scene? But reporting on the birther movement for years as true, and the ridiculous waste of money named the Benghazi investigation, continued denial of climate science, etc. does bother you? Fox doesn't bend fact, they omit it. They don't get credit for using 5% (yes, that's exaggerated) truth to sell their lies.

I watched Chris Wallace interview Conway just yesterday (for as long as I could stand it, which admittedly was only a few minutes), his questions were ok, but delivered with a slow underhand pitch and with no follow-up or contradiction of her ridiculous rambling factless replies. That's not good reporting, it's being the setup for spreading their agenda/propaganda.

You think CNN goes to far by using words like "accost" to describe 3 policemen tackling a topless woman in tights, and while you claim to have looked up the definition , you still claim the word is somehow loaded and not proper. Please explain.

When the police were going after the fleeing armed supporters of Mr Bundie under Obama I think you likely called them violent thugs who attacked that poor innocent man unnecessarily....Fox did. That man was armed and an anti American terrorist, but right wing so Fox called him a strong patriotic American standing up for American values that the unAmerican Kenyan thug in the Whitehouse wanted to murder.
There is no equivalence. Fox is (disgusting unAmerican) entertainment, not news. There is no right wing news outlet, they are all propaganda outlets and little more today.
The Ministry of Truth doesn't need fact, you will believe any nonsense they tell you to, even when it contradicts what they had you believe yesterday. They have you believing any non Trump biased news is fake news reported with hyper liberal bias, even in other countries, but Fox has good reporting and less bias.
*facepalm

While I generally agree, I think the cop that violently tackled the guy from behind was a bit overzealous. Did the cops even tell the guy to stop what he was doing or lay down/surrender? I didn't hear anything (but perhaps they did). That tackle was painful though - look at how the cop trapped the man's arms so he couldn't even protect his face from the fall. Brutal. The cops could have used a bit more restraint or commonsense...but yes, I agree that the guy that ran up to the bag put himself in harm's way.

*dead

*related=http://videosift.com/video/How-to-make-a-Hattori-Hanz-katana-Kill-Bill-Man-at-Arms

Your video, How to make a Hattori Hanzō katana (Kill Bill): Man at Arms, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 4 Badge!

Your video, Man at Arms - forging Arya's "Needle" (Game of Thrones), has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I think you'll enjoy this:
http://videosift.com/video/A-Man-Without-Arms-Uses-His-Feet-to-Get-By

"Bro, I knew something was wrong when a little, pretty white girl ran into a black man’s arms. Something is wrong here. Dead giveaway. Dead giveaway." - Charles Ramsey

Your video, Man at arms: Forging He-Man's Sword, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Hahaha Man-at-Arms looks like a penis with that hat on.

First I'd apologize to Irishman if my prior post seems a criticism of his and the links he posted. I'd only had time to read the second link when posting and had wanted to clarify there was more going on than just CIA money to Pakistan. Both the links given are informative and the first one in particular gives some detailed background of internal politics in Pakistan.

More over, it should go without saying but with the lack of votes and comments maybe it deserves to be said flat out. Pakistan(not Iran,Iraq or North Korea), is the most important country in the over trumpeted 'war on terror'.

Since the Pakistani government has little control of the border region by Afghanistan the Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces that were in Afhganistan have retreated there. More over, that tribal region has strong support for Bin Laden and the extremist ideas he holds. The important twist though is the AQ Khan network that was selling not only plans for nuclear weapons, but the equipment to make them. For those unfamiliar, AQ Khan is the man responsible for Pakistan's nuclear program. His success in building the bomb for Pakistan made him a national hero. So much so that in spite of being caught privately selling nuclear secrets and the equipment to build them there was public back lash at shaming him by forcing him to apologize over it. The political will to punish him for that is so weak that he is now on loose house arrest.

That means Pakistan is a nation where a one man nuclear arms dealer is still considered a hero by many. It is a nation where a border region is home to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban where they enjoy public support. You can bet the danger of those two problems colliding is the unspoken thought behind Washington's relationship with Pakistan. It's an extraordinarily delicate situation and any major changes like say, a change in leadership, should be watched with extremely keen interest by everyone.

Deceptively titled... no man's arms exploded in the clip

Dang it. It's a dupe: http://www.videosift.com/video/One-Legged-Man-One-Armed-Woman-Ballet

*discard

Snake, it's like you have a man-at-arms now or something.