search results matching tag: flour

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (56)     Sift Talk (5)     Blogs (4)     Comments (166)   

Granny those cookies are not for you

luxintenebris jokingly says...

Almost everything is a dog treat.

Think those are harmless. The ones, that know about, are flour-based. No butt or testes flavors added.

Have several vids kept for 'need a laff' days.

the pièce de résistance of most personal favorite LMAO vids is the sounds or phrases used.

Inferno: Dust Explosion at Imperial Sugar

BSR says...

I did an experiment in elementary school similar to this one but I used a coffee can with a snap on lid and flour.


KFC served me RAW chicken! Unacceptable!

A Bowl Of Peanut Oil Catches 7 Mice In 1 Night

Raccoons Really like Cookie Crisps

Sagemind says...

Except that's not food, so actually no one ate food

Cereal Grains (Whole Grain Wheat (35.0%), Maize Semolina (28.6%), Wheat Flour), Sugar,
Glucose Syrup, Wheat Starch, Brown Sugar, Sunflower Oil, Vitamins and Minerals (Calcium, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, Iron, Vitamin D, Folic Acid, Vitamin B6, Riboflavin), Fat-Reduced Cocoa Powder (1.2%), Salt, Icing Sugar, Cocoa Powder (0.5%), Natural Flavouring, Raising Agent: Sodium Bicarbonate, Acidity Regulator: Tripotassium Phosphate, Maize Starch.
https://www.nestle-cereals.com/uk/en/products-promotions/brands/cookie-crisp-brand/cookie-crisp

Baby Powder In Hair Dryer Prank Gone Wrong

Baby Powder In Hair Dryer Prank Gone Wrong

Jinx says...

It probably is mostly corn starch.

Vacuuming flour can end quite badly too

newtboy said:

I instantly thought of coal and corn dust. You would expect coal dust to be explosive, but corn? Yep, sure enough, it's also explosive. Apparently so is talc.

The science is in: Exercise isnt the best way to lose weight

transmorpher says...

Eat all of the cake you want, provided it's got little fat in it, it's made from wholemeal flour or oats, and most of the sweetness is from fruits/veges

Such as http://support.pcrm.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=108396.0&dlv_id=122422

Even though the carrots and raisins will do a lot to suppress the insulin response from the added sugar, I'd still look at putting in less and less each time as it helps bring out the other flavours, and of course refined sugar has no nutritional value.


And I nearly forgot: BANANA NICECREAM! The more you eat the better.

ChaosEngine said:

harsh, bro.... harsh

American Alcohol Has To Be Radioactive

MilkmanDan says...

...Ummm... Yes?

In the same way that "every scone produced in England *HAS* to be radioactive" (because scones are made from flour, eggs, and other ingredients that contain C14). Or, I could say "Queen Elizabeth discovered to be radioactive", because she is organic (in the Chemistry sense, meaning "containing carbon"). Or, you know ... EVERYTHING organic is "radioactive"; humans, animals, food, trees, etc. etc.

It seems very click-baity to draw attention to a US law that all alcohol must come from plants / organic (again, Chemistry rather than Hipster definition) sources by claiming that all US-made alcohol "must be radioactive".

Dear Future Generations: Sorry

Mordhaus says...

Why is there so much nuclear waste? Because we have so many people living in artificial environments that require tons of power.

Why is the Colorado river becoming almost drained and getting worse each year? Because of climate change, yes, but primarily because we have millions of people living in desert regions and agricultural crops like almonds that require laughable tons of water. Most of those almonds are turned into flour and milk products because people refuse to eat other food, or can't because they should be dead due to allergies.

Why are we overfishing and using such harmful methods as trawling? Because we have too many people that want a specific kind of food or can't afford a different type of food.

Could we switch everyone to insect proteins or other radical foods like spirulina? Yes, if you want riots. The technology doesn't exist that can make sustainable foods taste the same and people would go apeshit.

So to sum up, yes, we could feed people without damaging the environment, if you could get people to agree to it. Think of trying to force vegans to chomp on insects. As far as habitats, not so much. We don't have the room for the sheer numbers of people without either doing away with food producing land, destroying existing ecosystems like the rainforest, or putting them in artificially sustained areas like large cities or hot/cold desert terrain.

Nature used to take care of these situations via epidemics or natural selection. We have adapted to the point where we can beat most epidemics (although soon we will be hit with something bad if we look at the super bacteria we are creating) and we protect the people who should be dead against their own stupidity.

Climate change isn't going to kill this planet first, the sheer population rise will wipe it out much sooner than that. By 2030 it is estimated we will have 8+ billion people, by 2050 close to 10 billion. Exponential growth is going to suck this planet dry as a bone. The day is coming when we will HAVE to start supplementing food with non-standard food types and soon after that we will wipe out most of the living food items on this planet like a horde of locusts.

diego said:

actually, its not at all like that. the planet has food and land in surplus for everyone, but there is huge waste. Some of it is the price of technology and the modern life style, some of it is avoidable, reckless waste, but its not only a matter of "if there were only less people". That wouldnt make trawling the ocean any less destructive, or nuclear waste any less toxic. The planet is going to survive no matter what, the question is in what form, reducing the number of people on the planet only changes the time it takes to ruin the planet if the people that remain are going to continue irresponsibly consuming and contaminating as before.

Why Uber Is Terrible - Cracked Explains

Asmo says...

Gruel - "Gruel is a type of food consisting of some type of cereal—oat, wheat or rye flour, or rice—boiled in water or milk. It is a thinner version of porridge that may be more often drunk than eaten and may not need to be cooked."

ulysses1904 said:

"groul"?

How to Cook Rice Correctly

oritteropo says...

That's true for baking, but the errors involved in volumetric measurement of water and rice probably aren't significantly different than the errors involved in measuring them by weight. Sugar and flour can have quite different weights for a different volume depending on how tightly packed they are, but this is not true of either rice or water.

That said though, I do often measure rice by weight, so I know that half a cup (125ml) is close to 100g of rice (at least for long grain or basmati rice), and in my small pot 150ml of water is exactly right for that 100g of rice.

JustSaying said:

Here's a weird thing: I'm passionate about measurements.
This is a good, informative video. What pisses me off is the use of volumetric measurements. I know it's a regional thing but I can't just accept it. Volume is such a shitty base for measuring stuff compared to weight! Why can't everybody just use weight to measure recipes? It's much more accurate and even if you refuse to use the metric system, it's still the better choice. I just don't get it. What the fuck, America?

Porn Actress Mercedes Carrera LOSES IT With Modern Feminists

newtboy jokingly says...

FAUX!!!!!
Pho is Vietnamese noodle soup.

...Or do you really want to talk about "Pho-victimhood getting more press & media coverage than actual victims" Talk about off topic...why are you obsessed with people being victimized by noodle soups?!?! I've never even heard of that being a problem.
I prefer to focus on the issue of battered women....and I keep it simple-flour, eggs, butter, and milk.

GenjiKilpatrick said:

@Babymech

You're doing it again. Stop it. Your point is off topic.

Asserting that "no one, you nor I, is Sarkeesian's keeper." is a pointless tangent.

You're completely distracted by it. Stop it.

Pho-victimhood getting more press & media coverage than actual victims is the topic.

Start discussing that. Then we'll talk.

Korean girls taste American snacks (ENG sub)

lucky760 says...

Cute.

They're dead-on about Twizzlers.

So interesting to hear an objective opinion of some of those things. Growing up here with those things you don't realize they really do taste artificial and rubbery and like flour and fried garbage.

Nice dimples on the girl with the white sweater.

The Economist explains - Why eating insects makes sense

newtboy says...

The best idea I've heard is dehydrating them, grinding them to powder, and using it as flour (or flour amendment) as they mentioned. With a fine enough grind, you won't notice the chitin (at least not in texture).
I must say, eating most insects whole never sounded appealing.

Fantomas said:

The only reservation I have to eating insect based food is the ratio of meat to chitin. If there was a way to remove or soften the shells I wouldn't have any issues chowing down.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon