>>> I dislike Olbermann, an insincere, smarmy prick if ever there ever was one on the air. I can't believe even the leftists who like his op-eds can stand him. Keep an eye on him here:

http://www.olbermannwatch.com/

>>> I hate to begin with Slick Willie, but all this concern over the Libby non-issue weighs less than a feather when compared to the last-day-in-office pardons of Bubba.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardons_controversy

>>> Reviews of recent history demonstrate to me that Democrats, the silly cult of personalities they are, don't give a rat's patoot about the rule of law. There's also the fiasco with Gonzalez over the dismissal of U.S. Attorneys in 2006, which was perfectly legal. Why Gonzalez, who did nothing wrong, didn't tell critics to politely f-off is beyond me. But he didn't, and now he too is stuck in a pointless Democrat snare wasting time, money and energy over a non-issue.

I voted for bush, I'll admit it. I've even defended several of his questionable decisions, even though I was over in the Gulf myself at the time. To my knowledge, Mr. Libby's supposed "crime" about revealing in identity of a CIA member wasn't necessarily a crime at all, because the CIA member wasn't even an agent. They were not someone who was in deep cover, if anyone wanted to find out who they were, it would be a simple matter of looking them up.

>>> I believe you are correct in your assessment of the Libby fiasco. To me it was nothing more than a political witch hunt.

Perhaps I'm wrong about what happened with the CIA member and Mr. Libby, but the very fact that Bush would release that man from jail before the appeals process had even started is against everything this justice system was created for. It is in a word : wrong. To the very core of the word.

>>> Libbygate means little or nothing to me; whether the man goes free or rots in prison has no bearing on the fate of the country. Keeping the scum in Gitmo locked up is more important.

>>> I voted for Bush, or rather, against these socialist tools the Victicrats keep offering up. Yeah, Bush has let all of us down one way or another, it's true. He's really a liberal with a few conservative tendencies. He's failed to secure the border, failed to vaporize what needs vaporizing in the Middle East and though he wouldn't have much pull even if he was for ending Drug Prohibition, his past abuses of alk and coke have left no mark of compassion on failed drug policy for those still being locked up for life over a joint.
For all his faults, Bush is nowhere close to being the chimera the moonbat left has tried to create of him. Why should I take anything the left has to say seriously? They remain in complete denial over the war on islamofascism and how tax cuts create wealth.

>>> Hamilton said corruption was the grease of democracy. Focus on what matters to you.

4. Stoners Collectives: Place for all the stoners to hang out and share drug related videos, and drug policy activism videos."...--sounds personal, you should fuse it with the gorper collective, and starve to death on your own carbon dioxide.......and lack of meat
*quality

MKULTRA was real enough, her story I don't know. As far as I know it was from unsworn testimony and is well outside of areas I normally spend much time on so it's hard to say what parts are real and what aren't. The real parts were questionable enough to lend some doubt I guess.

The main reason I'm aware of the subject at all is that it brushed across drug reform as well, the Schaffer Library of Drug Policy has a collection of info based on the joint hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in '77. I don't know if she is mentioned but it should be good background on the subject in general.

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/index.htm

I'd give it a down vote if I could. Meth is about as dangerous a drug as we've got out there but hysteria and such isn't the way to teach kids. We've had enough scare ads.

The Drug Policy Alliance has a pretty good page on meth with links to more information. We do need to educate our kids about drugs but we've got to do it with science and facts, not with scare tactics they'll later find are exaggerated so cause them to doubt it all. These ads and the type are counter productive.

http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugbydrug/methamphetam/