Still not as creepy as skinwalkers, but pretty close.

I saw the real one too. It was strange, but pretty cool.

hooray for *lionhugs.

Not exactly a dupe, but pretty close. Here's the other.
http://www.videosift.com/video/Reunited-and-it-feels-so-good

*animation but pretty sweet.

are you serious? or are you just trying to get some more of that hot face rubbing from BF?

[edit] Your vid was last queued (and initially queued) 5 days 2 hours ago (cf. 4d4h from earlier comment). So, it is older than the 4 day limit. The bit about having been initially queued within the last 2 weeks (which is actually new to me, but pretty cool imo) means that if a vid doesn't make it out of the queue when originally posted, it has up to two weeks to get promoted back to the queue and published. I don't know if that would include begged videos (but it should).

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I think he's also used the phrase "choke on a bucket of cocks". It has more to do with the old time English and puritanical beliefs that sex organs in general are things to be ashamed of and worthy of derision. It's unfortunate but pretty ingrained into western culture.

Really simple but pretty direct explanations; though for the casual tourist the concepts of tatemae and honne isn't really going to be useful at all.

Very nice... that's something that actually looks good fun to try, relatively low risk, but pretty lights

and badly edited. lighting not too bad though. but pretty bad.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I think real. I felt cheap for laughing, but pretty funny.

I've never heard of this myth, but pretty cool proof nonetheless.

Late indeed but pretty enjoyable nonetheless. That was pretty great.

I say keep requeuing until this is published. There just aren't enough people seeing it.

I bought this album only because it was on Mike D's (Beastie Boys) Grand Royal record label. It was really poppy, but pretty good. Upvote for nostalgia.

Touche!

Yes, but the manner of this place is not formal. In fact, when I wrote my comment above, I originally wrote "If you write to one audience using the shibboleths of another," instead of "If you write to one audience using the manner of another," before I realized that the only thing I could inspire by using the word "shibboleth" in this context is hostility, or possibly just the end of paying any attention to me, assuming anyone other than Arvana reads what I say as it is...

But yes, assuredly, were I writing formally, I would make sure I said "...whom I love." Have you read "Woe is I," Arvana? It's a hoot. Not quite as funny as "Eats, Shoots, and Leaves," but pretty good.

Meh. I think some questions make sense (racism, etc..). Others - dealing with the nature and specifics of his belief - seem pretty cheap.

For example, would it be fair to ask a Muslim candidate whether they believed that Christ wasn't actually killed, but was miraculously saved by Allah? Now, maybe you do think that's a fair question - but pretty much nobody in the media would ask that, so I don't think it's that crazy for Romney to ask for the same treatment. If there's something substantive, ask - but if it's just "let's remind people that this guy doesn't believe the same as everyone else", then that's silly and unfair.

I think it's just as well if general religious questions not related to personal behavior or critical values are left off the table.