search results matching tag: 1950s
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds
Videos (277) | Sift Talk (8) | Blogs (11) | Comments (349) |
Videos (277) | Sift Talk (8) | Blogs (11) | Comments (349) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
police officer body slams teen in cuffs
Poe's law is an internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extremism are indistinguishable from sincere expressions of extremism.
Poe's Law implies that parody will often be mistaken for sincere belief, and.. sincere beliefs for parody.
You're a parody of yourself.. Bob-ception.
Firstly - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cases_of_police_brutality_in_the_United_States
Would you like to also explain how Racism is a modern liberal invention that didn't "truly" exist before 1950.
Second - LMAO. Really.. blame the media for YOUR racism?
You and Lantern are the ones portraying blacks as lazy stupid thugs & savages.
You can deny that.. But all your comments are archived so..
Yeah, the only reason FoxNews does it is because YOU watch it.
Lastly -
When all the dimwitted unapologetic willfully ignorant old racist folks like you finally kick the bucket.. then we can move on.
Your ignorance and denialism of White Privilege & White Fragility aka Aggrieved White Man Syndrome is the problem.
As soon as there's a generation where the majority of white people go..
"Wow, yeah.. our ancestors totally fucked everyone else over and we still directly benefit from that.. sorry guys.
We're gonna make up for that."
THEN we can finally move on.
That should probably only take another.. 300 - 500 years.
And why does Police Brutality exist? It was not truly present 20 - 30 years ago. Not like it is now.
As for white privilege:
As long as blacks are portrayed as unmotivated, uneducated, thugs. in the news and then media ( movies) there will be a perceived white privilege. The news and media have put more anti black fear into this country than any other group.
If you had to hire a 20 yr old for a factory job and all you know was that 1 was white and one was black , which would you hire?
When this answer becomes 50/50 then we all can move on.
oritteropo (Member Profile)
Haven't seen this one in circulation yet:
Is NAACP Leader Rachel Dolezal African-American Or Faking It
@bobknight33
Eric already posted the counterpoint to your stupid argument.
You're a waste of flesh who's upset that it's not the 1950s where you could be openly racist without someone correcting your bullshit.
Go back to the cave you crawled out of because you're definitely not here to engage in honest debate.
fallout 4 trailer
Fallout 1 was a technically antiquated VGA (that's right, 640x480, 256 colours) post-apocalyptic turn-based tactical RPG where you could not control you team mates during combat. It was a bit buggy (and so was F2). It was Mad Max, without cars.
And yet.
Fallout is arguably the best world-building work in the history of video games. People are probably going to dispute that, but most other games are built on pre-existing lore or works, or do not have that scope*. Fallout built its world pretty much from scratch, conflating a pre-war 1950's, golden-era, overly-optimistic world-view with the bleak desolation of the nuclear holocaust that ensued (to clarify for those who really know nothing about Fallout: in this universe a nuclear war happened in the 50s**. all that's left is from that era). Beside its content which was plentiful in and of itself, this created a contrasted, yet highly coherent and mature world (and by mature I don't just mean killing friendly NPC, I mean doing Morally Very Bad Things that don't necessarily result in graphic scenes). An open world that you could roam freely, be surprised by a new discovery that you made, and at the same time find these discoveries to fit perfectly with the game's logic. In most large games you just access new areas or are carried by the story, in Fallout you would go "Holy shit I'm in the middle of a city populated by centenarian ghouls!", shortly followed by "ho, of course it's full of ghouls, that's perfectly normal". There are not many games that have this mix of unexpected/logical and dark/humorous content.
Fallout 2 had the same ho-my-God-how-could-they-get-away-with-it VGA engine (so next to zero evolution there), but quadrupled the world map (with a minimum overlap with the one from F1) and brought it fifty or so years forward, expanding the world greatly (there are now rival quasi-city-states, and your action may influence their future), while also building on the first one: some antagonists 'classes' from F1 have now grown their own identity and became NPC, and some characters are still around -- a young character you saved in F1 went back to her settlement, became its leader, built it into a town, and is now in the process of expanding it into a new state...So Fallout 2 is basically the same game, except they did that one important thing: push the game world's boundaries even more. You could never guess what next city would be like, but you could bet it would have some crazy shit in it, and yet somehow still make sense.
That's why many people don't like Fallout 3. It is not in itself a bad game, but comparatively, it's kind of coasting. Also it's too damn easy.
I'm sorry, I got carried away, you were asking if you should play the previous ones? No, you 'should' not. But you could, and for F1 & F2 you would certainly not lose your time if you know what you're getting into. And if you don't, at least go and watch their intro on Youtube, they'll give you the feel of the world.
* Possible contenders in terms of "original video game world": Elder Scrolls (vast, but less original), Deus ex (not as large), Bioshock (same), Final Fantasy (original and vast, but not as complex). Any other idea?
** Technically not the 1950s, but in practice the 50s + a bunch of high tech gizmo.
I've never played any of the Fallout games. Should I go through the first three before I pick up #4?
Alternative Ballistics Less Lethal Firearm Attachment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States
QUICK! Find a reason to justify murdering 200-600 a year!
I'm sure you have personal, first-hand knowledge that they were definitely clearly all dangerous violent criminals.
Lantern logic:
600 = not that much because..
"COPS ARE ALWAYS GOOD & RIGHT!"
*pushes everyone out of his 1950s bubble*
What is your definition of 'plenty'?
Sarah Palin after the teleprompter freezes
You are partially correct, I listed the rank of a top submarine officer incorrectly, but not his position, I'm not in the Navy. He was Executive Officer of the first nuclear sub, but only First Lieutenant of the diesel. EDIT: He "qualified for command" of the nuclear sub...probably why I thought "commander" but properly should have said "was in command". Shortly after being assigned to lead the nuclear sub trials, after helping design and build it, he led the American shut down of the Chalk River reactor, lest you continue to insinuate he was an 'armchair warrior' that never held command.
(record below)
◾17? DEC 1948 - 01 FEB 1951 -- Duty aboard USS Pomfret (SS-391) Billets Held: Communications Officer, Electronics Officer, Sonar Officer, Gunnery Officer, First Lieutenant, Electrical Officer, Supply Officer Qualifications: 4 Feb 1950 Qualified in Submarine
◾05 JUNE 1949 -- Promoted to Lieutenant (j.g.)
◾01 FEB 1951 - 10 NOV 1951 -- Duty with Shipbuilding and Naval Inspector of Ordnance, Groton, CT as prospective Engineering Officer of the USS K-1 during precommissioning fitting out of the submarine.
◾10 NOV 1951 - 16 OCT 1952 -- Duty aboard USS K-1(SSK-1) Billets Held: Executive Officer, Engineering Officer, Operations Officer, Gunnery Officer, Electronics Repair Officer Qualifications: Qualified for Command of Submarine Remarks: Submarine was new construction, first vessel of its class
◾01 JUNE 1952 -- Promoted to Lieutenant
◾16 OCT 1952 - 08 OCT 1953 -- Duty with US Atomic Energy Commission (Division of Reactor Development, Schenectady Operations Office) From 3 NOV 1952 to 1 MAR 1953 he served on temporary duty with Naval Reactors Branch, US Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C. "assisting in the design and development of nuclear propulsion plants for naval vessels." From 1 MAR 1953 to 8 OCT 1953 he was under instruction to become an engineering officer for a nuclear power plant. He also assisted in setting up on-the-job training for the enlisted men being instructed in nuclear propulsion for the USS Seawolf (SSN575).
On December 12, 1952, an accident with the experimental NRX reactor at Atomic Energy of Canada's Chalk River Laboratories caused a partial meltdown. The resulting explosion caused millions of liters of radioactive water to flood the reactor building's basement, and the reactor's core was no longer usable.[7] Carter was ordered to Chalk River, joining other American and Canadian service personnel. He was the officer in charge of the U.S. team assisting in the shutdown of the Chalk River Nuclear Reactor.[8] The painstaking process required each team member, including Carter, to don protective gear, and be lowered individually into the reactor to disassemble it for minutes at a time. During and after his presidency, Carter indicated that his experience at Chalk River shaped his views on nuclear power and nuclear weapons, including his decision not to pursue completion of the neutron bomb.[9]
Just to correct a few fantasies here...Carter completed qualification to run a diesel sub, he was never the commander of a nuclear sub. He was never the captain of any ship, apparently, except the ship of state, which he proceeded to drive onto the sandbar of malaise.
U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville
You like Saturns?
My dad blew one up. And a Titan.
He was a Range Safety officer with the Air Force in the late 1950's, early 60's. Would blow up missiles that were going off course, so the debris would fall in safe areas. Blew up LOTS of missiles.
I have a really cool image of his going away present when he left Cape Canaveral -- a cartoon with him astride a rocket, in space, over Cape Canaveral. There are silhouettes of all the missiles he blew up over his time there on the side of the rocket he is riding -- with hashmarks for HOW MANY he blew up.
It's really cool.
He BLEW UP A SATURN. Which isn't as powerful as the Titan he blew up!
O wow, long time no sift, sorry. Once my account got locked at work, I just never visited anymore.
But I got to head out to the rocket center for the random acts of intelligence show, it was pretty awesome. All the video here is just from one of the 2 building...so ya, worth a trip!
The Saturn was more amazing than I had imagined. I always knew it was big, but seeing it sprawled out on the ceiling is indescribable. Imagine a 30 story building filled with explosives, lit on fire and hurling itself into space...because that is what this is. I have lots of pictures if people want to see, I will surely share them.
Glad to see sift is still alive and well. The sift, specifically a video by @dag, basically changed the course of my life and I am now pursing a degree in nuclear engineering, so thanks for that. Anyway, if I can figure out a way to change my name, perhaps I can once again partake of some sift action.
Formula 1 Pit Stop: 1950's & Today
3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
Formula 1 pit stops comparison: 1950 vs. 2013
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by eric3579.
Formula 1 pit stops comparison: 1950 vs. 2013
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Payback. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
Formula 1 pit stops comparison: 1950 vs. 2013
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Formula-1-Pit-Stops-1950-Today
Formula 1 pit stops comparison: 1950 vs. 2013
http://videosift.com/video/Formula-1-Pit-Stops-1950-Today
Dupe?
How the SR-71 Blackbird's Engines Work
Not impressed yet? What if I tell you this plane was designed in the 1950's?
Such an amazing piece of engineering.
They were originally going to put guns on it, but found that it would fly faster than any bullet, so used it as a reconnaissance plane instead. (it also flys faster than any surface-to-air missile, so by the time it was detected it was already out of range)
Authorities Seize Family Home Over $40-Worth of Drugs
Heroin is indeed a nasty drug. However, when it's managed, people can actually lead normal, even productive lives and still be addicts. It was legal in the UK up to the 1950s as diamorphine and we didn't see anything like the kind of problems we have with it now.
That said, I'm in favour of decriminalising it, not legalising it. It might sound like a non-distinction, but there's a difference between allowing anyone to go out and buy heroin from a pharmacy and prosecuting some poor fool who made some bad life choices.
As for Trance, he continues to push his childish agenda in the face of reality. That Tolstoy quote is cute and sounds great, until you realise that it is completely and utterly wrong.
Then you got the whole war on drugs component, which is even more nuanced because heroin is a nasty drug which I would agree should remain illegal. But then weigh that against the idea that it was a trivial amount of heroin. Would you feel bad for the family if the son wasn't small time and had a couple grand worth in the house? how about a 100 grand? a million?
All completely separate from the police abuse and corruption issue that's already been discussed. This video is crazy dense with issues that need to be addressed
newtboy (Member Profile)
While the climate is complicated, the climate science is not. The U.S. winter temperatures plummeted from 1950 to 1979. The scientists reacted to this with a "global cooling" scare, as reported by Science News in 1975 (PDF). As such, NASA warned of a new ice age by the year 2020. Then, after 1979, temperatures got much warmer, so NASA's James Hansen began the global warming scare (PDF).
But after the year 2000, temperatures began to plummet again. So NASA and NOAA responded with the only sensible solution. They altered the data to eliminate the earlier warmth and the current cooling.
But that wasn't sufficient for keeping up with the cooling temperatures, so they renamed "global warming" as "climate change."
It is for these and other reasons that climate science undercuts its efforts with fraudulence.