newtboy says... IMO, yes, she is a public political figure and open to public negative comments about her, not a private individual reading his personal comments about/to her. If she became a sifter and he personally attacked her, we would likely have to discuss revamping the rules to cover what's acceptable to say about public figures, but as far as I know she will never read his comments about her so they aren't meant to be taken personally even if they're directed at a singular person.....does that make sense? Personally I think it's better to explain why you think a poster is "X" rather than just state it, anyway. Arguments aren't ever won by name calling. But that's just, like, my opinion, man. I'm just a Newt on the net, not a moderator. Mystic95Z said: But its ok that he basically said same thing of AOC?