Oh you have got to be fucking with me.

Definitely gonna hafta *blog this.

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - blog requested by MarineGunrock.

Porn should be *banished I say.

landshark has been nominated for banination by gorgonheap. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.

Hmm.. Inappropriate? Maybe. But is it really porn? I mean, they aren't having intercourse. They aren't modeling so you can see their body. Just the crotch styles. I would move for a +discard, but not necessarily a +ban.

How is that porn? Nudity != porn.

This is crazy for sure, but I vote it stays. Definitely not ban-worthy.

[edit] - Why even discard it? Let the queue work.

[edit2] - In fact, I want to *return it, so I can vote!

I never remember that edited invocations don't work. *return

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by jonny.

*blog it back to continue discussion

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - blog requested by jonny.

Clearly not porn, by Videosift standards. To paraphrase Dag during a previous Sift Talk, if you're not whackin' it, we're not discardin' it. No question about it.

*return

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by rembar.

what discussion? this is *art and should be *returned.

if this isn't art, then da vinci is a gay pornographer.

if this is porn, i am gonna blog all the 9/11 as snuff.

what kind of a dictionary are you using?

Adding video to channels (Art) - requested by MINK.

And following that line of thought, it probably does not belong in the sexuality channel. It's fashion and *art!

*nochannel *terrible *wtf

This video has been removed from all channels (Art, Sexuality, Terrible, Wtf) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by jonny. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Adding video to channels (Art, Terrible, Wtf) - requested by jonny.

Sifty - I said art before nochannel. guess you don't read like us meatbags.

*nochannel *terrible *wtf

This video has been removed from all channels (Art, Terrible, Wtf) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by jonny. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Adding video to channels (Terrible, Wtf) - requested by jonny.

doh! sorry mink. we're commenting all over each other. *art

Adding video to channels (Art) - requested by jonny.

I'd vote not pr0n. Not erotic either. Definitely wtf. Lots of that.

I certainly didn't think it was pr0n or I wouldn't have sifted it. I just thought it had loads and loads of WTF.

But I guess some people have itchy ban fingers.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Definitely not porn - it passes the wood test with me. No wood is all good.

But seriously, is he trying to say that they grew their pubic hair to those lengths? Some looked to be a bout 4 feet. Surely they were extensions?

Fantastic...I'll never trim again!

@ dag: That's comedy gold:"No wood is all good"

And mlx:
Please, for the love of men everywhere, Say it ain't so!!!

Up with art.

haha. oh, the ever so controversial female body.

Yeah, it can't be porn if watching the video makes one more flaccid.

Gives a whole new meaning to the word "beard."

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair Bizarre' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' - edited by joedirt

errr. it's *comedy, right? and lol @ the google ads on this one...

Adding video to channels (Comedy) - requested by MINK.

Do ya pubes hang low, do they tumble to and fro, can you tie em in a knot, can you tie em in a bow?

Would make interesting beachwear alternatives. You could pull it up through the back and around the waist- a bushy thong!

Excellent, and very funny. Well acted. Don't let the current climate get us all banny and worried about lovely ladies and a great comedic piece, please. Thanks, various, for the calm heads (ha) and quick return.

Needs to be a boobies tag ...

Wow, good thing I didn't see this at work because of the thumbnail shots.

Woo! And Ant downvote! Never saw that coming!

rofl @ haricotvert

And MINK, I don't get ads, what do they say?

The only way I can describe my reaction is

its a viral campaign for Remington

*viral anyone?

Invocations (viral) cannot be called by smibbo because smibbo is not privileged - sorry.

Jesus/God the reactions. reset poor gorgonheap and jonny!!!

It's the end of the goddamn world!

Don't worry landshark....if ya get banned because someone pulls an asterickky by accident, it does not mean they don't hate you. Great Post, but simply can't vote for it-that much human aberration in one room is simply too much-

Hilarious! Although I couldn't help but wince a little at the thought of having extensions applied to my nether-regions... bleh!

PS. All you little boys still afraid of the neked female body need to do some growing up!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody, merkin' - edited by calvados

Loved the peacock, LOL!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Smibbo - can you give us your source that this is a viral campaign for Remington?

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Smibbo is right: http://www.ragingartists.com/artists-in-advertising/2006/09/remington.html

*viral for sure

Adding video to channels (Viral) - requested by dag.

This video would have been discarded out of hand 6 months ago. Still think it's inappropriate for VS, but I guess that means I need to grow up, huh? LiveSift? VideoLeak?

Since anything goes now...

very well done. its too clever to be porn.

(I'd add a bit about the mockumentary artists and Remington if it twas my post.)

Fletch, nudity does not = pornography (which is what is banned here, no one ever said no to boobies). Just because a person is naked does not mean they are doing anything remotely erotic or sexual (pornographic). Eroticism is all in the actions, scenario, atmosphere and other psychological factors employed... just being naked does not a porno make. These models are a pretty good example because they are not only naked, but displaying, uh... art(?) in an area considered to be erogenous; yet still, they are not doing anything at all sexual, rather they are acting like typical underfed, prissy, pissed off, walking clothes racks... I'm pretty sure very few people viewing this felt at all aroused, probably most of them were like me and were just fighting to keep lunch down.

And for anyone who still thinks that a lack of clothing instantly equals porn or is bound to trigger some kind of sinful, impure thoughts, I highly recommend you take a life drawing class (even if you suck at drawing or have never done it before), not only will you come to appreciate the fact that about 90% of people probably look better with their clothes on, but you will be treated to one of the most un-erotic experiences of your life... and even the most juvenile of you boys will probably realize that, surprise! It is entirely possible to be in a room with a neked woman and not get a big rubbery one...

If you can't get yourself enrolled in a drawing class, then take a trip to a nude beach, because THAT will probably be just as instructive... although the nudists might insist you take off your trunks too, in which case, well, don't say I didn't warn you

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

^ I concur with this. And before you bring up my discarding of the nude magician ages ago - I would like to say that I didn't do it because of the nudity - but because she pulled a hanky out of her woowoo.

And I recanted.

Rofl @ "woowoo"

Yeah. To say that this is inappropriate would be like saying that Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus is inappropriate.

Yeah, I blogged it, but that's because I wasn't sure if it was acceptable by the community standards. I find it humorous.

holy fuck (no anger implied) this is a shit ton of posts !
whoo hoo I'm number 53 !

aside from the naked bodies :-) I thought this was an extemely well done spoof, with just the right amount of pretentiousness to its real life counter part. good sift for humor and shock value !

Did you see the Peacock?

Possibly the funniest moment now on the internet.

Holy crap that peacock is insane haha. *sexuality

Videos are limited to being in a maximum of 5 channels - ignoring all requests by thesnipe.

Can we please change/remove the thumbnail? I noticed this is in the top 5? People viewing this, at work or in public places, can get in trouble.

Dude, ant, the thumbnail is tiny tiny on the top 15... do you do QA for the gestapo or something? Conversely, one could always consider not mixing sift with work... I know I sure don't.

I VS daily, during my lunch hour. And yes, I do QA (Internet security software).

Upvote because this is the weirdest video I've seen.

Oh and the comment from the prude american thinking this is porn is the dumbest comment I've ever seen! When you shower in your YMCA do you scream "STOP THE PORN!"? No seriously, you're retarded!

campionidelmondo,
Please refrain from personal attacks.

'TVF Model' is superimposed under every model's name in the clip.
TVF = The Viral Factory. They're one of the few ad agencies that actually make funny stuff.

Is it time to make it 3 goldies to ban?

WTF? This is beyond bizarre! LOL at the peacock

This is hilarious! I don't find this in any way inappropriate for this site. Love it.

*dead

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by Thylan.

here's the original for a diamond fixer

Awarding Grimm with one star point for fixing this video's dead embed code.

*parody

Adding video to channels (Parody) - requested by EDD.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by eric3579.