"... The kids play with another old piece of technology, an old camera! Find out if they can figure out how to take a picture! ..."

Bonus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hL4JNkOHs
newtboysays...

No Photo Fluid!!!
This is the Devil Camera!
Just AWESOME!

(He didn't tell them that the quality could be way better than any digital camera though, not that they would care)

siftbotsays...

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Sunday, November 9th, 2014 1:24pm PST - promote requested by eric3579.

MilkmanDansays...

Hmmm. Debatable. Film is sort of "analog", so a good film picture can be blown up / magnified much more than a digital picture before it would look muddy/pixely. On the other hand, for anyone outside of professional photographers, getting a good digital picture is MUCH easier than getting a good film picture. I remember average-to-cheap film cameras that had to be focused, needed just the right light, no motion in the subject, etc. whereas even cheap digital cameras tend to auto-adjust to that stuff much better.

newtboysaid:

(He didn't tell them that the quality could be way better than any digital camera though, not that they would care)

newtboysays...

Good points, but I meant 'automatic' film cameras of today VS 'automatic' digital cameras of today. All other things being equal, film will give better quality than any but the best professional digitals, but even new film cameras are more expensive and bulky for the same features...+ film, + developing, + prints.

MilkmanDansaid:

Hmmm. Debatable. Film is sort of "analog", so a good film picture can be blown up / magnified much more than a digital picture before it would look muddy/pixely. On the other hand, for anyone outside of professional photographers, getting a good digital picture is MUCH easier than getting a good film picture. I remember average-to-cheap film cameras that had to be focused, needed just the right light, no motion in the subject, etc. whereas even cheap digital cameras tend to auto-adjust to that stuff much better.

ChaosEnginesays...

Even then. Take a selection of equivalently priced film and digital cameras (adjusted for inflation) and give them to a range of photographers.

I'd bet large amounts of money that aside from the very top tier photographers using top tier SLRs, digital will beat film every day.

newtboysaid:

Good points, but I meant 'automatic' film cameras of today VS 'automatic' digital cameras of today. All other things being equal, film will give better quality than any but the best professional digitals, but even new film cameras are more expensive and bulky for the same features...+ film, + developing, + prints.

oritteroposays...

I love film, and always did, but even the cameras in high end modern phones will beat the old compact 35mm cameras every time for image quality. This doesn't mean I won't take out my compact 35mm camera (Olympus mju II btw) and use it occasionally, but for a quick snapshot I'll cheerfully use my phone.

Phone cameras are not quite ready to take on 6x6 rollfilm cameras (I love my tlr too ) but digital cameras do exist which can.

A final thought - sometimes the best camera is the one you have with you

newtboysaid:

Good points, but I meant 'automatic' film cameras of today VS 'automatic' digital cameras of today. All other things being equal, film will give better quality than any but the best professional digitals, but even new film cameras are more expensive and bulky for the same features...+ film, + developing, + prints.

oritteroposays...

Sometimes you only have a short amount of time to grab the shot, so you might as well use whatever camera you have with you, no matter how unsuitable. If you have time to go and get the more suitable camera you didn't bring, then that's the time the one you don't have is better.

If it was me, I'd still take a shot on the unsuitable camera first, just in case

ChaosEnginesaid:

Only sometimes?

I'd love to know when a camera you don't have on you is better than one you do

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More