Post has been Discarded

How to give a woman a squirting orgasm (explicit!)

Redtube embed sez: NSFW.. at all!
EDDsays...

Oldie - and a goodie. Have had the idea to post this many times over, yet I obviously never had the balls - so I salute you, gwiz Although if memory serves, the complete video used to be some ~20min or so - before the actual demonstration the guy talked at length about proper approach, preferred diet (e.g. pumpkin seeds), etc.

P.S. What do you guys think - should I post this one? Or is it too pornographic?

EndAllsays...

>> ^gwiz665:
MGR: The educational slant on it makes it not porn. Porn is for enjoyment, this is not.
Like this isn't porn either (barring rule 34): http://www.videosift.com/video/MRI-Video-Of-Couple-During-Coitus


Those are hardly the same!

I've seen this video before, when I was about 15 and it blew my mind. I wanted to go test out my newly learn-skills.. and while it certainly is educational, I think it should stay on whatever porn site you found it on.

Also want to note that he mentions before doing this (in the longer version of the video) that his subject has been prepped for months already, with all the massaging and alleviation of pressure and all that. This wouldn't work to the same effect on any old gal. It's not entirely educational in that it's not easily applied knowledge. A lot of work went into having her in that state and able to orgasm in such a manner.

I dunno, I stick to the rule of 'if it's on a porn site, it's porn.'

And this isn't for enjoyment? Go to the original URL, look at how many views it has (8,831,170), and ask yourself how many of the people that watched it DIDN'T have their dick in their hand.

alien_conceptsays...

Hmmph. It kind of is porn innit. Naked orgasming well oiled sexy lady and all...

But fair play gwiz for putting it on. All men need to learn this, and we women probably wish we could bend oursleves in the right direction to do it alone!

EDDsays...

This is BS. This is not porn and if you think it is - you're wrong.

Who in the world would wank off to this video I don't get - when on whichever site this is uploaded there are a 100 more that are 1000 times more hardcore than this. And EndAll - puh-leaz, 8+ mil views mean that the majority of the viewers got off watching it? I'm absolutely sure that, like me, the majority of men were more interested in subject matter than in sneaking in a quick wank in these 10 minutes.

Let's face it - dag did the right thing for VS by taking this down - but not for the reason this was porn ('cause it's not). No, it was because the advertisers have shown they're extra-touchy about sexuality and the naked body, and it's better not to tempt fate this way. So I support dag's decision but I strongly disagree with whoever says this is porn.

EndAllsays...

Just because it's not porn for you, doesn't mean it isn't for many others. A picture of your wife's feet is porn for some. You can't be absolutely sure of the intentions behind everyone who watched this video. It is only slightly educational. It would not happen like this in real life, as I pointed out before, his subject was prepared for weeks/months in advance to be able to have an orgasm like that. What you see on the video is the result of the massaging and alleviation of pressure points throughout the body, not the finger-technique. If you think that you can achieve these results simply by repeating the finger-technique demonstrated in the video, that's unrealistic. The video didn't include any explanation of the massaging techniques, or anything else beforehand, just simply the part of the video where the action happens.

spoco2says...

I too have to say that while this is a tastefully done video and educational, it is, like EndAll says, not, in and of itself instructional. It is, rather, the action at the end of a very long process.

It's great stuff to know, and it's good to see a woman being given pleasure like this... BUT, as said, this won't teach you how to do it on it's own.

And does it belong on the sift? No. It's not instantly saying it's porn, but it's also saying that isn't really the level of material that should be on the sift, it's not the audience.

If you want to go to other sites and view this, go right ahead. If you want to start up your own website which is full of instructional sexual videos like this, and as explicit as you wish, go ahead.

But don't get antsy that the sift doesn't want this here... it really is a slippery slope.

And EDD... I could easily beat off to this... seeing a woman be given enjoyment like this is a huge turn on, so don't go thinking that everyone watching it is purely doing it for educational reasons, it is a turn on, it failed Dag's test (as it would if I were the test giver)... so, yeah... no good for here.

entr0pysays...

This video is useless unless they tell us what drugs she's on. Seriously watch just the last minute and try to deny it, she's out of her gourd.

But yeah, it's absolutely porn from my perspective. The concept that women somehow have to be disrespected for it to qualify as porn is a terrible fallacy. Nor does there have to be any penises, plastic tits, caked makeup, or faked orgasms. In fact all of those things pretty much ruin it for me.

I guess some people would say that porn without the trappings of the porn industry is actually "erotica". But I'd say those people are snobs.

kageninsays...

>> ^entr0py:
This video is useless unless they tell us what drugs she's on. Seriously watch just the last minute and try to deny it, she's out of her gourd.


I've put girls in that state without drugs. You must be doing something wrong.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More