I love the CCOKC!

Oh how CCOKC made me smile, I laughed while watching CCOKC, I thought while watching CCOKC... my god that's some deep CCOKC there.

Christine Lakin good looking woman.

funny bit about hair & wardrobe stylists, also conceals an indictment.

it was the 80's, and the rest of the gays in other jobs
(like neil patrick harris) just weren't out, yet.

because most would've lost those jobs if they came out.

without gay people, half the entertainment industry would wither & die.
and what else does america still profitably export?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece

The most common same sex relationship were beteen adult men and boys in their teens. It was called pederasty, or boy love basically. Relationships between two older men had the same stigma attached back then as it does today. Adult men were expected to be masculine. "there is ample evidence in the theater of Aristophanes that derides these passive homosexuals and gives a glimpse of the type of biting social opprobrium heaped upon them by their society." - Basically its not a good example and I cringe every time I hear it.

Didn't load for me so I YouTubed a backup: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxCWUegUPMs

The CCOKC versus dick comment at the end reminds me a bit of Team America's dicks/pussies/assholes classification system -- good stuff.

So what's a dick then? We can't all be throwing it around like that. They're confusing me.

*backup=[...snipped...]

Added alternate embed code for this video - backup requested by Zifnab.

A couple of those CCOKCS are hot.

Porn. In the United States alone, the porn industry is almost as profitable as spectator sports and movies combined. Don't ask me how I know that....>> ^my15minutes:

and what else does america still profitably export?

so, i ask what the US still profitably exports, other than the entertainment industry.
and your answer is... porn?

porn is part of the entertainment industry.


and don't worry, i wasn't planning on asking you how you knew that porn makes roughly as much money in the US as all other movies & spectator sports combined.
because you don't know that.
because there's no fucking way that's true.
and please don't bother replying to the contrary unless you can cite a reliable 3rd party source.
>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Porn. In the United States alone, the porn industry is almost as profitable as spectator sports and movies combined. Don't ask me how I know that....>> ^my15minutes:
and what else does america still profitably export?

I never realized how much Kristen Bell resembles Evie from Out of this Word.

So cool to see all those awesome CCOKCs from my childhood all grown up.

*promote

Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Thursday, April 12th, 2012 1:10pm PDT - promote requested by lucky760.

This was grinworthy, but with the final frames finally extracted a good laugh.

These child actors are still children.

Somebody woke up on the asshole side of the bed....
>> ^my15minutes:

so, i ask what the US still profitably exports, other than the entertainment industry.
and your answer is... porn?
porn is part of the entertainment industry.

and don't worry, i wasn't planning on asking you how you knew that porn makes roughly as much money in the US as all other movies & spectator sports combined.
because you don't know that.
because there's no fucking way that's true.
and please don't bother replying to the contrary unless you can cite a reliable 3rd party source.
>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Porn. In the United States alone, the porn industry is almost as profitable as spectator sports and movies combined. Don't ask me how I know that....>> ^my15minutes:
and what else does america still profitably export?

oh, excellent! an ad hominem attack. thank you.
i take it this means you can't back up your moronic claim from earlier.

any hitler analogies you'd like to make now?
or just put down the shovel, and quietly climb out of the hole you're digging for yourself?>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Somebody woke up on the asshole side of the bed....

I always thought Josie Davis was the better looking of the two daughters on ChuckInCharge, and now I know why.

Wow, I'd find someone to talk out your anger issues with if I were you.

>> ^my15minutes:

oh, excellent! an ad hominem attack. thank you.
i take it this means you can't back up your moronic claim from earlier.
any hitler analogies you'd like to make now?
or just put down the shovel, and quietly climb out of the hole you're digging for yourself?>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Somebody woke up on the asshole side of the bed....

on the chance that your concern for my well-being was genuine,
let me first assure you i'm not the least bit angry, in general or at opus.

in the (more likely, imho) event that you were attempting to somehow
defend opus, my advice would be, don't. it presupposes that he is defenseless
or disadvantaged, when he is neither. he has just as much of a brain as i or anyone
else, and is just as capable of using it, before typing something regretfully absurd.

a little training in debate would do him great service, however.
this is equally true of you, if you were attempting to come to his aid,
as you managed to commit the same mistake - ad hominem.

you compounded the problem by begging the question.
the question in this case being, "is he angry?"
i see nothing in my text you replied to, that could be misunderstood
as an indicator that i was angry. my little smiley face there was authentic,
because his ad hom indicated that he realized he couldn't back up his previous assertion.

again, if your reply was genuine, then thanks for your unwarranted concern,
and i apologize for believing it unlikely.

in either case, i would humbly ask that any further replies on this matter,
from yourself or opus or anyone else, be directed to my homepage instead of this page,
as what we're discussing has absolutely nothing to do with a funny clip about gay rights.
thanks. - owen
>> ^sickio:

Wow, I'd find someone to talk out your anger issues with if I were you.
>> ^my15minutes:
oh, excellent! an ad hominem attack. thank you. blahblahblah.

Wow, you're smart. You must be a master debater. But you clearly have no sense of humor.>> ^my15minutes:

on the chance that your concern for my well-being was genuine,
let me first assure you i'm not the least bit angry, in general or at opus.
in the (more likely, imho) event that you were attempting to somehow
defend opus, my advice would be, don't. it presupposes that he is defenseless
or disadvantaged, when he is neither. he has just as much of a brain as i or anyone
else, and is just as capable of using it, before typing something regretfully absurd.
a little training in debate would do him great service, however.
this is equally true of you, if you were attempting to come to his aid,
as you managed to commit the same mistake - ad hominem.
you compounded the problem by begging the question.
the question in this case being, "is he angry?"
i see nothing in my text you replied to, that could be misunderstood
as an indicator that i was angry. my little smiley face there was authentic,
because his ad hom indicated that he realized he couldn't back up his previous assertion.
again, if your reply was genuine, then thanks for your unwarranted concern,
and i apologize for believing it unlikely.
in either case, i would humbly ask that any further replies on this matter,
from yourself or opus or anyone else, be directed to my homepage instead of this page,
as what we're discussing has absolutely nothing to do with a funny clip about gay rights.
thanks. - owen
>> ^sickio:
Wow, I'd find someone to talk out your anger issues with if I were you.
>> ^my15minutes:
oh, excellent! an ad hominem attack. thank you. blahblahblah.

2 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.