Haha, I'll admit it took me some time but I eventually got there. So funny and so nasty.

Oh my word..

I always get this kind of stuff ... but I've watched it three times and I'm not sure what it is they snuck by the censors. Any hints?

Finger prince...

This show was so awesome. Definitely as much for the parents as the kids.

i'm with her

Awe-SOME!

didnt get it till right after the video was done. Now I'm disgusted. South park couldn't even come up with that.

I'm just wondering if that wasn't their intended meaning. Is it possible that the meaning, as interpreted by her, is supposed to be "finger Prince for the crime," as to suggest he committed the crime?

>> ^Xax:
I'm just wondering if that wasn't their intended meaning. Is it possible that the meaning, as interpreted by her, is supposed to be "finger Prince for the crime," as to suggest he committed the crime?

Well it seems like they would need to have some kind of plausible explanation. This is sort of a stretch, though.

Well she refused, but Prince would gladly be fingered.

I think it is a play "fingerprints." Maybe?

I recall one episode's "secret message" in the credits was:

"Name omitted from The Name Game: Plucky"

>> ^rychan:
Well it seems like they would need to have some kind of plausible explanation. This is sort of a stretch, though.


I don't know... I think it's a bit of a stretch to think they would be refering to the sexual act here. It's been a while since I watched this show, but I never saw anything approaching that level of risqué. It just seems too much for that show, and I have a hard time believing they would intend that meaning, knowing that the main audience for the show were kids... even if most kids would have no understanding of the reference. They would have to know that many would.

It's just too blatant for me to accept that this was their intention.

The Animaniacs spend a whole lot of time emulating a style of humor that is full of 'dirty jokes'. The writers, or voice actors, know what their doing. Of course this was intentional.

I think the coy smile on Prince's face says it all. I'm sure cartoonists try to sneak in little jokes like that all the time. Just look back at all the controversy that popped up over the years with Disney. The penis building in The Little mermaid, the word SEX in the dust in The Lion King. Aladdin supposedly saying "Take off your clothes" to the tiger in... well...Aladdin. I don't really think it's too crazy to assume the same sort of thing goes on with all cartoonists. Heck look at the new spider man cartoon. During a fight with Black cat she says "You better not get your goop in my hair." Now sure, that has a totally innocent meaning in the cartoon, but the choice of words makes me think it was designed to get a laugh out of an older crowd. I dunno, maybe we're all just perverts.

Link to that spider man episode/scene:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYTXcgzKKhk

>> ^Lordoderus:
Just look back at all the controversy that popped up over the years with Disney. The penis building in The Little mermaid, the word SEX in the dust in The Lion King. Aladdin supposedly saying "Take off your clothes" to the tiger in... well...Aladdin.

Notably, Snopes found those urban legends to be false, undetermined, and false respectively.

http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp

She was told to "dust for prints." Nothing here, really.

Definitely slipped it by the censors. Also check out the barney rubble one in the related videos for a similar example.

Oh come on, all those who think this is just an innocent accident, look at the look Prince gives her after she's told to finger him.

Give the writers some credit, this is great comedy!

>> ^robbersdog49:
Oh come on, all those who think this is just an innocent accident, look at the look Prince gives her after she's told to finger him.
Give the writers some credit, this is great comedy!


Agreed. Whoever thinks this is innocent hasn't seen the Animaniacs. Or at least they haven't seen them since they were young.

this is included in a compilation list of others. they were dirty

http://www.thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/221-the-top-moments-in-animaniacs

definitely intentional! I looked it up

I think the fact that she looks at Prince, says "I don't think so" and throws him out the window says that this was one snuck in.

and that prince smiles directly at the suggestion that he be fingered.

Meh.

Rule 34!

>> ^rychan:
>> ^Lordoderus:
Just look back at all the controversy that popped up over the years with Disney. The penis building in The Little mermaid, the word SEX in the dust in The Lion King. Aladdin supposedly saying "Take off your clothes" to the tiger in... well...Aladdin.
Notably, Snopes found those urban legends to be false, undetermined, and false respectively.
http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp



I don't trust that site, I can PROVE one of his "False" claims is actually true.
This is the scene where the minister becomes "Aroused" as he so puts it.
If he's looking on the new released dvd's, then I doubt he'll be able to find some of the things mentioned, mostly
because it'd be edited out. However, the original VHS' may have a different story.

http://www.joblo.com/newsimages1/urbmermaid.jpg

For the still non-believers, this is the scene in the movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InFLnzeQjWw

One? One!? One!!!? You people haven't been paying attention.