I can see how with lots of bad luck and bad construction methods two planes could take down two buildings. I can, just because there are still two planes left. The Pentagon is thick and strong, a plane would leave little damage. Ok, let me buy that one too then. It still leaves one plane. The 4th one with bogus phone calls, no black box, and a small hole on the ground as debries. The 4th plane that crashed amidst some woods, and what did it leave behind? A hole smaller than a suburban-type pool. Before taking over the commands, passengers called family for eternal farewell such as: "Mother, this is Alfred Burmington, your son, I'm on a plane that is about to crash. Good-bye. My voice doesn't sound like your son because I'm very shaken with this outrageous situation."

This loose end makes the entire story fishy and it's not the conspiracy theorists fault, it's the terrible investigation that decided to leave questions unanswered instead of explaining to us how the construction company responsible for the construction of the twin towers in the 70's which now is a big company tied to big interests fucked up the whole thing by not following protocol to achieve bigger gains, etc. Typical case of construction company corruption. We'd all be happy if those yuppies were put to sleep or incarcerated in a homo-bears-yuppy-fetishists-filled prison. What about admitting the possibility of a spy planting bombs on the pentagon? Oh noes, that would shake the public opinion of the US military seriousness and leadership. Well it's already shaken by the fact that no planes were intercepted on that day. And yes we all heard about the excuses for that. Maybe they're true but still incomplete as any other explanation.
But that small hole on the ground the 4th plane left, that's the kind of bullshit nobody should get away with. And like a loose string it will make the entire bullshit crawl methodically

RED TIE?! BLASPHEMY

Isn't it ironic that the "show"'s sponsor also put a panel in front of the videoplayer time-bar and can't be pulled away?

SCAT

If the USA encouraged attrocities and once in a while bombs a lil wily bit a country to stop those same attrocities, one shall conclude that both these argumentists (one more eloquent than the other, indeed) share the same flaw in their reasoning.

It's not up to a country like the USA that encourages attrocities (and puts them in practice too...) to judge, "save" or run another attrocities-making country. The only thing a country as such may await is being equally judged and "saved."

For now it's a matter of retaliation and counter-retaliation, but may we hope one day the ones judging and saving have the right to do so.

>> ^poolcleaner:



you tool you

HA HA Americans and their fears.

I laugh at what only american parents do to their kids.
ah. ah. ah.

Predictable advertising is predictable... Why make any other kind of advertising than viral marketing? Advertising departments don't even need to try to hide it. The more we think about how we're aware that it's viral marketing, the more we forget that it still is advertising something in our face.

bad idea, badly executed.

My friend says he wants to die
He's in a band
They sound like Pearl Jam
The clothes are all black
The music is crap

Is the singer referring to himself here?

>> ^Nithern:
further evidence that Bush should have not just been impeached but executed for being to stupid to do his job! No accountability at the White House. Ironically, wasnt the GOP complaining about accounting standards to the Democrats and Acorn back at the election? Maybe they should hold themselves fully accountable? But no, being irresponsible is the hallmark of the Republican Party.
Still, it does show there were alot of educated people, who warned that the storm was not looking good. Hell, a Cat 5 Hurricane should NEVER be blown off (no pun intended) like the president did.
I would rank Hurricane Katrina as Bush's second worst issue in his two terms (the first being the handling of Iraq & Afghanistan).


Nuremberg the Bush.

(Hello, first post here)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the segment about the renaming of the troops left in the middle east is not from Obama's presidency but rather Bush's. Video edition at its best...