search results matching tag: peter higgs
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (7) |
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (7) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Higgs Boson Confirmed!!
And in other news today....Peter Higgs announced that he is God.
Higgs Boson Confirmed!!
>> ^charliem:
Food for thought: Peter Higgs despises media calling it the God Particle.
True story.
Yup... Apparently it was supposed to be called the goddamn particle because it was so hard to detect...
Higgs Boson Confirmed!!
>> ^charliem:
Food for thought: Peter Higgs despises media calling it the God Particle.Apparently he much prefers calling it the "Peter Higgs is God Particle".
Higgs Boson Confirmed!!
>> ^charliem:
Food for thought: Peter Higgs despises media calling it the God Particle.
True story.
Me too.
Higgs Boson Confirmed!!
Food for thought: Peter Higgs despises media calling it the God Particle.
True story.
The british joke about the Black hole machine
Exactly, Priceless!
And Nobel feuding begins as Dr. Hawking (who estimates a 1% chance micro black holes will be created but thinks they will evaporate), bets $100 that the Higgs Boson will not be discovered and Professor Peter Higgs attacks Dr. Hawking's scientific credibility. More collider humor at http://www.lhcfacts.org/?cat=29
Comprehensible, in depth modern particle physics lecture
An interesting article about Peter Higgs, a humble guy who says:
"Most of what has been attached to my name should not have been," he replies, "but probably the Higgs boson is correctly attached because I was probably the person who drew attention to it most in my papers. However, as far as the mechanism of generating vector boson masses is concerned, I usually write down a whole string of names, starting with Anderson and including Englert and Brout, Gerald Guralnik, Dick Hagen and Tom Kibble, and also Gerard 't Hooft."
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/7/6
The physicist in the video, Kim Griest, says the typical theoretical upper bound for mass of higgs boson is around 1 TeV. He, personally thinks around "1000 GeV" is where it should be, "maybe up to 2000 GeV". Yet, Jos Engelen, CERN's chief scientific officer, who's been at CERN since 1971, say's "LEP showed that the Higgs was heavier than 114.4 GeV, and we can also guess its mass from other experiments. Within the Standard Model we know that it is not heavier than 240 GeV at the 95% confidence level." Engelen says that the LHC will only be able to produce pairs of Higgs bosons if the Higgs mass is less than 500 GeV. Hmmm, I remain thoroughly confused
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/9/7
The New York Times has a suprisingly good, and lenghty, article about the LHC with nice multimedia:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/science/15cern.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
CERN has a metric shitload of media and info here:
http://press.web.cern.ch/press/
- It kinda bugs me that they have such a strict copyright on their media. Isn't it predominantly publicly funded?
Perspective on collision energies:
The LEP, the predicessor to LHC, prior to going offline in 2000, topped out at --- 104 GeV.
The Tevatron at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is running at ---------------- 1.96 TeV.
The LHC will initially be capable of colliding beams of protons at an energy of -- 14 TeV.
The abandoned SSC project here in the US would have been capable of --------- 40 TeV.