Open legs to all cumers “family values” slut and Q nutjob Traitor Greene made another baseless accusation based on extreme far right propaganda and nothing more, and because civility, decorum, truthfulness, ethics, morals, and house rules mean less than getting a playground dig at a political opponent, Greene waived the rules of conduct and ethics that don’t allow slander for her and ignored it, tabling the issue herself without hearing the legitimate appeal. Big surprise. She was quickly silenced because she couldn’t control herself though and had her words taken down and lost her time in committee.
Now watch her cry a river over her unending line of affairs with anyone that can get a medically assisted boner and hold their lunch long enough to have sex with a failed sex reassignment case being brought up, but crickets about this baseless infantile accusation.

We all know Traitor Greene tried to sleep with Russian oligarchs but was turned down. We all know she tried to sleep with Saudis but was laughed at. We all know she’s a sloppy, manly slut for anyone BUT her husband. We all know Traitor Greene hates transexuals because her surgeries turned out so horrific.

We don’t know Salwell slept with Feng, there’s zero evidence of that, only that she worked for him for a short time,( just like we never had evidence of the pizza pedophile ring she railed against, the Jewish space lasers she said cause wildfires, the mind control microscopic computer chips Bill Gates put in the vaccines somehow, the crisis actors pretending to be school shooting victims…the list of absolute insanity she spouts on the floor is endless)…and never ending evidence of Traitor Greene sleeping with anyone that can/will have her while abandoning her husband and children and job to sneak around screwing gym owners, sex gurus, reporters, etc,etc, etc. opening herself up to blackmail.

Glass Houses, biatch!

Nice. Members of the house rules committee have said what they’ve seen so far in evidence clearly rises to the level of treason, and Trumpist witnesses are expected to rely on the 5th amendment under oath, so will be offering no other explanations or excuses, no reason to think it wasn’t pure treason.
They also mentioned treason is a death penalty offense.

Trump gets to be first again….first president ever executed for treason against the US….and he won’t be alone. Woo hoo!

@bobknight33

Be honest. If a Republican-led impeachment inquiry into Obama were stormed by Democrats blatantly ignoring security, house rules, and common decency simply so they could delay the inevitable and disrupt a democratic process, how would you feel?

(I expect if he's actually honest, the answer would come out something like Westley when he answered Count Rugen when he asked how having a year of his life sucked away felt)

What. No OR questions. Get the fuck out. Game update -- patch that rule right in there. If you play this game in my house, you're going to feel the burn of house rules: No or questions, and 10 second turns. That shit is like hardcore Guess Who.

On the housing thing, I found this really informative.

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/512/house-rules

According to tonight's news, over 170000 people have petitioned the white house to enforce the Logan Act and prosecute all 47. by White House rules, they must now respond in some way.

That was awesome. Also, new house rule for congress.. all debates will now take the form of rap battles.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I like John Irving for that category - Cider House Rules or World According to Garp.>> ^longde:
Anyone else want to weigh in on @kymbos request of the Great American Novel? I think Twain' Huckleberry Finn is a must read (I actually reread this story every couple of years and still enjoy it).
What other candidates do people have?>> ^longde:
Huckleberry Finn>> ^kymbos:
I'm reading Chuck Palahniuk's Fight Club, which is a pretty good page turner.
I'm interested in reading some classic American literature if anyone would recommend some for a guy who has never really read any of the classics (like Mark Twain, Hemmingway, Fitzgerald).
I'm green.

@marbles
They don't exist. No one decides if I have a right to life, but the society decides that I have a right to life within that society. It is essentially a house rule.

Life is a biological process.

Our internal compass is nature/nurture. We are taught most of it by our parents and can be molded when we are young, but some things are biologically "built in" through natural selection.

>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:

He can be safely ignored as a hypocrite and liar.


Is he wrong? I mainly ask because you seem to find budget issues rather important.

You may not like Rep. Weiner, but that has no effect on whether the bill violated house rules. Do you disagree with PAYGO or does it just not apply to this bill?

@blankfist, since you're sick, I'll try to make my point directly. My overall argument is that you're already living in a "voluntaryist" society, and just don't like the implications of the contract you've agreed to. What I'm saying here isn't how I see the world, but how I think you should be looking at the world based on your own principles. I am, indirectly, trying to show you that your own principles bear reexamining, or at least the conclusions you're currently drawing from them.

Now, back to making my argument:

You don't need to sign things to give consent. In your last comment you agreed that there can even be unwritten implications inherent in all agreements that must be considered binding (i.e. that a rental agreement with the mother would naturally allow her permission to add a child). Now the only missing piece is that I think there's an open question about the kid's options are if the mother dies or merely decides to move out, and the kid wants to stay in my house. For the sake of argument, let's say he's an adult when this happens.

I say that since it's still my house, the son is still obligated to follow the house rules, and obligated to contribute the way his mom was. I decide that since he was born here, it's only fair that I consider him a signatory to the agreement mom signed, and entitled to the full range of rights and duties contained therein. If he decides he can't abide by that agreement, then he should know he can't live in the house anymore, since he only gets the right to live there via that agreement.

More broadly speaking though, if I allow guests into my home, they implicitly agree to abide by my rules in the house. If they don't want to follow those rules, I'm within my rights to ask them to leave. If they don't, I'm within my rights to use force to remove them.

This is entirely the situation with the US (or any other nation, for that matter). The government of the country holds allodial title to the land within its borders. What citizens buy when they buy title to land is fee simple -- it's ours, but not in the sense that it becomes sovereign territory exempt from all US law.

In other words, I think if you want to be assiduous about property rights being the sole determinant of authority, you are essentially making the argument that the government has a legitimate authority to levy taxes and enforce laws. Taxation isn't theft, refusal to pay taxes is theft. Violence against police who enforce laws you disagree with isn't self-defense, it's a breach of contract, and willful destruction of property (namely the bodies of the cops you injure).

Again, this is not how I see the world. I reject the notion that property imbues its owner with absolute authority, and I reject the notion that all contracts are inviolate.

Hey.

I think I got off on the wong fut wit chew.

I think we are on the same side.

No small calculation, considering the times.

You made me laugh at least twice.

Hey. "Whore house rules."

And that means nothing.

Welcome to the Sift.

Look forward to seeing you around.

The video needs a second * Isdupe

So the votes can be transferred to your posting of it. Not sure if it'll let you Isdupe it though, if you couldn't invoke it.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
They forgot the school house rules; It doesn't matter how loud your siren is but who's boat is made from carbon fiber and who's from metal!


I think the sound cannons were coming from the whales, as well as the water cannons.

The Japanese ship Shonan Maru, was providing security to Japan's whaling fleet. They go to great lengths to create distractions using aggressive diversions to keep the activists from the "Sea Shepherd & affiliated Ships" busy - Then they send out five or six whalers to suck up every whale within miles - It's like "Clear-cutting" the ocean for it's resources. I'm not an activist but the Japanese have eliminated all of the whales and large fish in their own waters and now spend their time encroaching and often poaching in foreign waters.

They forgot the school house rules; It doesn't matter how loud your siren is but who's boat is made from carbon fiber and who's from metal!