search results matching tag: fusor

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

  • 1
    Videos (1)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (0)     Comments (9)   

This Amateur Physicist Built a Fusion Reactor in His Shed

This Amateur Physicist Built a Fusion Reactor in His Shed

19-year-old hopes to revolutionize nuclear power

bcglorf says...

What Taylor built though was a fusor though, not a breeder reactor. A fusor is basically a vacuum chamber with a high voltage wire run into the center and a place to puff in a bunch of fuel gas. With a fusor you get a short term burst of radiation, but nothing before or after is contaminated. With a breeder reactor you start with a bunch of dirty material and make more even dirtier material.

shang said:

he's copycatting the "Radioactive Boyscout" who built a reactor in his backyard in 1995
http://harpers.org/archive/1998/11/the-radioactive-boy-scout/

it leaked radiation and he was picked up and his back yard was dug up, garage and all, and put into barrells and taken to nuclear waste area. The EPA were all in "space suits" in his yard, and he had tricked the nuclear regulatory agency and several places into providing him with info by faking his age and making fake letterheads.

the wild thing is the boy scout actually made a breeder reactor, but it was leaking a lot of radiation the EPA was registering radioactive material all over the yard and into neighbor yards.

Big Laser Construction

Crake says...

I expect it's part of a fusor, one of the ways of creating fusion - you take a bit of hydrogen isotope and encase it in a pellet, and focus insanely powerful laser beams on it from all sides, and it undergoes fusion from all the heat and pressure, hopefully.

Should Google Go Nuclear?

Should Google Go Nuclear?

Better Than Regular Fusion; the Polywell Fusor!

Better Than Regular Fusion; the Polywell Fusor!

Better Than Regular Fusion; the Polywell Fusor!

charliem says...

>> ^Drachen_Jager:
The problem with this system is that it takes 1.2 units of energy to produce 1 unit of energy. In other words you have to put more energy into the system to power it than you actually get out the far end.
Of course Bussard was of a different opinion but it's worth noting that his is a minority opinion among physicists and it's likely that he was simply wrong.


Care to show some evidence to back that claim up ?

  • 1


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon